posted by admin on Nov 14
The existence of lolicon has both positive and negative side effects on us, but so would is the banning. A Pedophile might not rape a child because he has lolicon, but he might decide to rape a child if he doesn’t have the lolicon. In other words, a pedophile might rape a child because he has lolicon, and not rape a child if he doesn’t have lolicon. The existence of lolicon isn’t something you can call judge; it all depends on the pedophile himself in question.
Now, on the legality of banning lolicon: It would be destructive. Obviously, the First Amendment protects free speech on porn rights doesn’t allow for people to use that speech to incite others to break the law.
In the same manner, lolicons should only be illegal if it encourages pedophiles to rape children. But it also has to encourage the pedophile to rape a child. If the pedophile watches a loli-hentai with men having sex with children and fantasize on it, does that mean the lolicon caused him to do it? Obviously it depends on the content of the video and the mental state he already has.
But hentai where a man rapes a woman and then go out and rape a woman in real life, could mean that that his mental is stable and that the lolicon caused him to do it. It does not seem to have a constitutional basis for banning lolicon unless it openly invited the viewer to harm real children.
And it is not impossible to hold in your urges. If you see a beautiful woman on the street and are attracted to her ,you don’t run over to her and rape her? Lolicons are here to make you have a good time.We should learn to appreciate it without doing the same thing to others who are not willing.